A few years ago, I took the decision to voluntarily leave my family and study for a year in France. Later on, I chose again to move and work in the United Kingdom. Within the European Union, such mobility is promoted and there is no need to justify your decision or to have a visa to do so - as an European citizen and within the EU it is my right to establish wherever assists me to develop to my utmost potential, to keep growing, to know a different culture, to speak new languages, and to be financially stable. This makes absolute sense to my generation, however 30 years ago (before the Schengen Agreement) this process would have been much harder to achieve and probably older generations couldn't imagine such openness. When looking at the refugee situation, the resistance to embrace the newcomers is the resistance to a new reality that needs to be as flexible as the one granted to Europeans. The difference is that this is not a voluntary migration but rather imposed unto people for not having a choice: they either flee or they risk their lives by staying in a war-zone (or becoming the fighters themselves). What would you choose?
Since reaching its
media attention this year, I see that the refugee crisis comes down to a crisis of
priorities that began long time ago in our world and is affecting our sense of
humanity. The shocking images that flooded the big screen in the past months, along with xenophobic comments from the far-right are symptoms of a bigger problem, that is: The Devaluation of Life.
The belief that
one's life has more value based on where one was born reminds me some
medieval-like-wars in a Game-of-Thrones-land, almost unthinkable in World Wide
Web times. However, this year's events showed a darker side of Europe where
countries started closing doors to those in desperate need, in a clear
reflection of barbaric attitude against the "others". The main
difference is that before speed-of-light communications we would not understand
how wars happening in the other side could be interlinked with the people on
this side of the world.
In today's reality,
in developing nations we have the support of real-time analysis, people's
reports, factual testimonials, whistle-blowers, bloggers and documentaries
raising awareness to the needs of the few being paid at the expense of the
many. Further down I briefly clarify how the war in Syria and in other
countries in the Middle East are directly related to the lifestyle
European/Western citizens enjoy. For the moment, let's look at the mental
barriers that hinder us to know the "other side". Any attempt to
blame the "other" for not being able to take care of its own people
is a sign that we haven't yet grasped the interdependency that all countries
coexist in, or how world politics and economics really work. The idea that borders
separate us from other humans is another illusion but is simply showing the
success of economic and political interests in diminishing our inherent value
as equal beings sharing this planet.
Similarly
to the manifestation of solidarity with the French events, first with the
Charlie Hebdo attacks and then with the 13/11 terrorist acts in Paris, it is
time to stand equal and one with refugees, reminding ourselves that many of our
ancestors have also escaped from war-zones and that we must not accept further
wars to break the lives of future generations. Only by standing in
solidarity with refugees will be able to demand political action to prevent
such atrocities again. That is why I state: I am a refugee / Je suis un réfugié - whatever is happening in this
moment in time I am part of it and, as Martin Luther King said "No one is
free until we are all free".
The destructive wars that people in the Middle East are fleeing from are not only killing them from the inside, but also limiting any chances of survival. I have been asking myself: what would I do if I was caught in such a hostile environment? I would most likely do what they are doing to find a peaceful place to live and begin the healing process.
I am originally from
Portugal, a country within the European Union that has been under a tough
financial crisis and where there has been a devaluation of Life too. I have
been seeing the slow-death of joy in many people's hearts struggling to
survive. Economically speaking, the education, people's work and the resources
in the country aren't enough to cope the hardships that the economic war
imposes unto them, so many decided to emigrate to find a better environment to
grow-up, to learn from and to create a better life for themselves.
In a recent
interview I run independently in the centre of Lisbon, I asked the Portuguese
people how the country could help the current migrants and refugees. There is a
common tendency to think that we first need to help "our people"
before we can help others. Another perspective was that migrants and refugees
wouldn't be happy in Portugal either because of the poor life standards that
the majority of the people have now. Nevertheless, many agree that we must be
able to stand as an example and offer as much help as possible, since our
problems are far less than the ones that the people from war-zones are
experiencing.
By looking at the
statement that we can only help "others" after we help the nationals
of a given country, we see that the migration crisis is a mirror of what is
happening already within one's borders, where poverty and homeless people have
been difficult social problems to tackle. This is an opportunity to finally
address the social and economic issues that are preventing EVERYONE from
creating their own destinies, and the refugee crisis is simply enhancing the
existing non-sustainable social structures where poverty and inequality are
still a reality for many Europeans.
If the European
countries were all stable and all their citizens lived well, would people
embrace refugees, or would there be cultural clashes, fears and other mental
limitations used to justify the lack of funding, infrastructure or social
support? Systematic changes take time to be understood and accepted by people,
especially when people have been educated (brainwashed) to define themselves as
the national symbols, and feel threatened by multiculturalism and diversity.
But as with the principle of mobility within the EU, global mobility from the
East to the West, from the South to the North are a reality that must be
welcomed and taken into consideration, not suppressed or punished.
In
relation to the interdependence we all live in, we can easily look at our
western lifestyles and wonder where prime resources come from to keep us warm,
to enable transportation, industries and to essentially make society run. As
with any other war, the root of the problem is related to the control and
dominion of land and natural resources in specific areas of the world.
According to Oil & Gas Journal, Syria was estimated to possess proved
reserves of oil at 2.5 billion barrels as of January 1, 2015 and shale oil
resources, with estimates of reserves in 2010 ranging as high as 50 billion
tons (see http://www.eia.gov/beta/international/analysis.cfm?iso=SYR). This is what is the ultimate
justification for the destruction that is causing people to flee from war
zones. Therefore, in the name of our own comfort but also in the name of the
comfort of all the other human beings, it is our responsibility to find solutions
that consider what is best for all. We don't need to wait for further revenge
or terrorist demands that will perpetuate the perceptions of separation. We all
know that the only solution is to mature international relations toward a new
level of cooperation, responding to everyone's needs and fostering peaceful
living.
In my perspective,
the biggest lesson to learn from the migration crisis is the consequences of
our Devaluation of Life. Despite all technological advancements, we haven't yet
been able to come with plans and actions to manage world resources fairly and equally,
and to apply political will to consider all peoples of the world. It is also a
red flag about the false perceptions we have of "other people" based
on specific religious or cultural differences that are deliberately shown by
the media as the problem, instead of educating that differences are sources of
diversity and expansion.
Additionally, I
suggest that this becomes an opportunity to challenge that narrow-minded belief
that we can either help "our people" or "the others", and
instead we adopt the possibility of "having both" - this can be
possible by creating the funds to address the social-economic priorities of
nationals through solutions such as the Living Income Guaranteed, while at the
same time fund the immediate needs of refugees through the profits we are
making in exploiting local resources, and finally to establish a common ground
for the West and the Middle Eastern societies to benefit from shared resources
in a sustainable way through fair diplomatic negotiations based on the
principle of valuing Life.
Why do we continue
to play musical chairs with people's lives, knowing that this world and our
species has plenty of solutions to offer?
I also recommend
watching the open discussion on the Refugee crisis organised by the Living
Income Guaranteed, where you will hear first-hand experiences about the
integration process of refugees in Sweden, Denmark and in Germany. As Anna Brix
Thomsen demystifies, we fear that which we don't know and that is also why many
people have resistance to accept refugees in Europe - but once the mental
barrier is transcended, a whole new world of opportunities, of personal growth
and understanding is available toward a better future for our humanity.
